Blog

Navigating the Maze: Deciphering Scope 1 to 3 for Organisational Decarbonisation

In the journey toward organisational decarbonisation, defining the boundary for identifying Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions is akin to learning a new language...
Navigating the Maze: Deciphering Scope 1 to 3 for Organisational Decarbonisation

In the journey toward organisational decarbonisation, defining the boundary for identifying Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions is akin to learning a new language—a complex one at that, filled with nuances of ownership, operational control, and equity share. It's the critical first step, laying the foundation for a comprehensive decarbonization strategy. Yet, even with established protocols in place, the path is fraught with challenges, requiring organisations to navigate a technical jargon to take regulatory and strategic decisions.

The Conundrum of Ownership vs. Operational Control

Consider the case of one of our customers involved in one of Europe's largest infrastructure projects, facing a daunting challenge in classifying their Scope emissions. Despite controlling operations, they didn't own the assets. This scenario presents a dilemma: follow the BEIS recommendation, suggesting asset owners report emissions, or adhere to the GHG Protocol, which places the responsibility on the entity with operational control.

This example underscores the broader confusion facing organisations today. The decision isn't merely operational; it's strategic, affecting how a company's environmental impact is perceived and managed. It's a choice that can align—or misalign—with both local policies and broader sustainability goals.

Aligning Strategy with Reporting Standards

The challenge for companies lies not only in selecting the right allocation methodology but also in ensuring that this choice harmonises with their overall strategy and the evolving policy landscape. It's a decision that demands a deep understanding of both the letter and the spirit of environmental regulations, a task made all the more difficult by the rapid pace of change in sustainability governance.

The Path Forward: Building Internal Capabilities

The complexity of the emissions reporting landscape is understandable. With policies in flux and the stakes for environmental stewardship higher than ever, organisations may struggle to build the internal capabilities required for effective emissions mapping and allocation. It's a process that takes time, resources, and a commitment to continuous learning.

How We Can Help

If the intricacies of emissions classification and reporting seem daunting, you're not alone. Our team specialises in demystifying the process of decarbonisation for organisations across sectors. Through tailored workshop engagements and an AI-enabled platform, we guide our clients in not only identifying but also capitalising on the most profitable insetting opportunities. Our approach ensures that your decarbonization journey is not just compliant but strategically aligned and profitable.

In the rapidly evolving world of sustainability policy and corporate responsibility, having a partner who can navigate the complexities of emissions reporting can make all the difference. If you're looking to refine your strategy, clarify your emissions boundaries, or simply explore your options, we're here to help.

Let's Start a Conversation

Decarbonisation is a journey that no organisation should undertake alone. With the right guidance, what may initially seem like a regulatory hurdle can become a strategic advantage. If your team needs advice in mapping and allocating emissions, or if you're ready to take the next step in your sustainability journey, we invite you to reach out. Together, we can turn the challenge of decarbonization into an opportunity for growth, innovation, and leadership in sustainability.

Amandeep Singh, Decarbonisation and Sustainability Lead at ExpectAI

Start your journey to decarbonise, profitably.

Continue reading